Dear fellow researchers

Dear fellow researchers,

I noticed that Andreas Decker shared his research about glyphs and their antonyms.

His core theory is: If we wanna find out the antonyms of a specific glyph, just find out its Axisymmetric image
or Centrosymmetric image.

I think the theory is imperfect.

Example A:
PERFECTION (also known as BALANCE) and IMPERFECT
They are a pair of antonyms, but they are not axisymmetric or centrosymmetric, so we can
get a conclusion:
Axisymmetric or centrosymmetric are not the necessary conditions here.

Example B:
ADAPT and SAVE
They are a pair of axisymmetric image by the vertical axis, but they are not a pair of antonyms, so we can get a conclusion:
Axisymmetric or centrosymmetric are not the sufficient conditions here.

Example C:
The "REMEMBER" and "EMBRACE"
Andreas Decker said REMEMBER and EMBRACE is the axisymmetric image of FORGET and IGNORE by the horizontal axis.
So why not change them, REMEMBER and EMBRACE is the centrosymmetric image of FORGET and IGNORE?
Your cycle theory said, “Forget-Ignore-Remember-Embrace” is a cycle, so it fits the counterclockwise now.
We can't even confirm which is REMEMBER and which is EMBRACE.

So, I think we can't hastily concur this theory, until we get more intels.

Stein Lightman Edgar Allan Wright

https://plus.google.com/+thedeacon1972/posts/AYfVwWmLdnm

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

<base...

Akira Tsukasa and DeepMind