Hooooookkkayyy Sooo,

Thomas Greanias  new writings got me to thinking. If Misty Hannah  could do it, why not? I mean ADA wanted to learn how to do it, so it must be "Learnable" correct? So hyper threading as we know it is being able to bend space and time to a single point so that an object like Misty can travel from Geneva to Texas in an instant kind like stepping into a Traversable wormhole. 

But Lukas, +Misty Hannah didnt go through a portal.

You are right!. But Misty has been XM exposed correct. So theoreticlly she could be very element needed to be the portal via Morris–Thorne wormhole

Lorentzian traversable wormholes would allow travel in both directions from one part of the universe to another part of that same universe very quickly or would allow travel from one universe to another. The possibility of traversable wormholes in general relativity was first demonstrated by Kip Thorne and his graduate student Mike Morris in a 1988 paper. For this reason, the type of traversable wormhole they proposed, held open by a spherical shell of exotic matter, is referred to as a Morris–Thorne wormhole.

To see why exotic matter is required, consider an incoming light front traveling along geodesics, which then crosses the wormhole and re-expands on the other side. The expansion goes from negative to positive. As the wormhole neck is of finite size, we would not expect caustics to develop, at least within the vicinity of the neck. According to the optical Raychaudhuri's theorem, this requires a violation of the averaged null energy condition. Quantum effects such as the Casimir effect cannot violate the averaged null energy condition in any neighborhood of space with zero curvature,[19] but calculations in semiclassical gravity suggest that quantum effects may be able to violate this condition in curved spacetime.[20] Although it was hoped recently that quantum effects could not violate an achronal version of the averaged null energy condition,[21] violations have nevertheless been found,[22] so it remains an open possibility that quantum effects might be used to support a wormhole.

So a Jaguar  in Texas? Pits with long roots? 2 agents chasing him that he thought were dead in the Congo?

There is a whole lot of timey whimey weird stuff going on.
Now we can think that maybe Hank was wrong. Or maybe they were saved or resurrected. 

Or..... 

Maybe we are not looking at a normal Space/Time worm hole maybe we are looking at:

 the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. In 1991 David Deutsch showed that quantum theory is fully consistent (in the sense that the so-called density matrix can be made free of discontinuities) in spacetimes with closed timelike curves.[27] However, later it was shown that such model of closed timelike curve can have internal inconsistencies as it will lead to strange phenomena like distinguishing non orthogonal quantum states and distinguishing proper and improper mixture.[28][29] Accordingly, the destructive positive feedback loop of virtual particles circulating through a wormhole time machine, a result indicated by semi-classical calculations, is averted. A particle returning from the future does not return to its universe of origination but to a parallel universe. This suggests that a wormhole time machine with an exceedingly short time jump is a theoretical bridge between contemporaneous parallel universes.[30] Because a wormhole time-machine introduces a type of nonlinearity into quantum theory, this sort of communication between parallel universes is consistent with Joseph Polchinski’s discovery of an “Everett phone” in Steven Weinberg’s formulation of nonlinear quantum mechanics.[31]

Not only would this solve the glitch of the dead again alive again rise of the +Hulong Transglobal people. But it could have also served as a "PAST, PRESENT, FUTURE" machine......
KINDA.

If you have an infinite number of universes each one being just a hair different from the rest, eventually you will find a universe that is ahead or behind our current progression. So it would seem that you are time traveling but in all reality you are not. And things wont be exactly the same. 

So now that i went off on a bit of a tangent. Copper for your thoughts?

https://plus.google.com/102489350322422853902/posts/9oam9TgvxBD

[embed]https://plus.google.com/102489350322422853902/posts/9oam9TgvxBD[/embed]

Comments

  1. I think you made my brain melt and run out of my ears. I'm going to have to come back go this after I've had a nap. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oooh~ Didn't really understand the whole wormhole things but I like your thinking about the different universes.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Makes sense to me. Granted, I only understood around 3/4 of that, but from what I understand it seems like it would make sense.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I've known you for over a year and yet when you start talking to yourself my brain goes to mush.

    ReplyDelete
  5. David Timothy Cat S. Derek Allen Kira Kroger This explains it much better Michio Kaku: Time Travel, Parallel Universes, and Reality

    ReplyDelete
  6. The critical thing to remember is that every potential thing that could happen has its own branching universe where it did happen.

    ReplyDelete
  7. That does explain it better. Frankly, it's something that I've thought of before; contemplated in idle thought.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yes Conclusion. We really are creating the story. But there are multiple versions. IE story boards, Posters, Movie scrips. In our world its a game, in another its a movie in another its a book, it really happend. all the same slightly different.

    We do control the branches. I know that for a fact

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

<base...

Akira Tsukasa and DeepMind